Looking at the graph of unemployment rates, it is revealed that the month and year of Luke Schwartz's birth had an unemployment rate of 5%. The probability of this being anything related to the birth of Luke Schwartz is very small, but it is not zero. However, I confidently say that the birth of Luke Schwartz is unrelated to the unemployment rate being at 5%.
I agree, you have to keep all of your facts in line. The birth of Luke Schwartz was a pivotal point in US history.
This is good insight. I feel like that c Econ word can come into play here somewhere cebrius parabous or smth